July 7, 2005
-
One day, only one day, after the elation of learning they were selected to host the Olympic Games of 2012, Londoners are faced with the devastation of a terrorist attack. In thinking about his, having this reality sink into my experience, I realize that what I am experiencing as ineffable sadness contains an equal part of righteous anger. I am pissed as hell!
Whou could have the temerity to bomb, to shatter, the Shalom of God’s world like that? What on earth could make people think that destroyoing innocent, unkown and unknowing lives could ever make a legitimate political statement? Jn would tell me that these sort of people are interested neither in a political statement nor legitimacy. Jn was also correct in saying all this has done has been to harden the resolve of those who remain and witness to resist these (and any) terrorists…
We have lived with terrorism in this country, as well as abroad, for decades – just listen to Paul Simon’s “A Church Is Burning”, or Lena Horne singing “Strange Fruit”; think about the attacks on abortion clinics and doctors in the 80′s and 90′s… the Basques… the IRA.. the Serbians (who claimed responsibliity in the bombing of Laguardia Airport that killed my great-aunt)… Kent State and the National Guard…now Al Queda… They all do great acts of evil in order to paralyze the good. But we will not, cannot, be paralyzed by the fear they create. “They can burn down my churches, but I will be free” Paul Simon
For now, all we can do is teach and parent well, work towards Shalom, and pray… hold each other as we mourn…
Jn says that evil is stronger than good, and he makes a well-reasoned case for it when he remarks that it takes months to erect a building, but mere seconds to destroy it. I would add that it takes years to build a relationship, but again seconds to destroy it…. A neighborhood takes many years to grow into a cohesive enclave, but once a devisive or violent element encroaches, it can decay in months. Today I learned there are over 1,000,000 gang members in the United States – what does that say for the future of our neighborhoods? Plainfield has never recovered from the riots of nearly 40 years gone…
There is no way I can quibble with Jn’s observations – evidence does suggest that evil is stronger than good. My objection is to the conclusion. I believe there is evil in the world, for we see its effect, and I believe that it is a powerful force. What I do not concede is that evil is stronger than good. I know evil to be the antithesis of good, of God — it is the not-God, le néant of Ellul. This néant, this nothingness, is the true opposite of God’s good Creation — it is the ally of chaos and entropy. And this is where we start to get at the truth of the nature of good and evil.
Just as in nature all things devolve from a state of order (higher engergy) into chaos (a state of low energy) without a corresponding input of energy, evil is easy and lazy. It requires little energy. Order, creation, requires energy — requires work and participation. It is not easy to do good. This does not imply that good is weaker. If that were so, there would be no hope for Shalom, no order or love left in this world, for evil has had its opportunity for a very long time.
Good is not easily conquered. Every time lovers meet in a park, or kiss in the silvered moonlight… every time a parent consoles a heart-sick child… every time a friend reaches out a hand to a friend… every time strangers respond to the plight of strangers… This is the energy of participation in goodness, in the continuing work of God’s good Creation, in Shalom. This is the light that drives away le néant, the nothingness, that is evil.
Goodness is light and love — blazing with energy and life. Evil is nothingness, a black pit of entropy and death. Love is stronger than death, stronger than death on a cross. Good will triumph — all that is required is your participation. Evil will only triumph when good people are silent, are lazy, do not participate.
Comments (3)
I am willing to entertain the possibility that God absenced himself from the temporal and spacial to a degree that he has permitted evil to reign over good here. That does not, however, mean that evil is stronger. If Mike Tyson decides to sit patiently in the corner while Woody Allen beats the life out of him, does that mean that Woody Allen is stronger?
What you say has merit, but it seems to be less that God has absented Godself, and more that God is letting God’s children settle scores between themselves. It is more that evil has opportunity rather than permission to reign. You are correct – evil is not stronger than good, but the fact that it requires energy to do good, to combat evil, often weakens the resolve of those who would champion good to act. People do not like to take the harder path, and evil takes advantage of this fact.
I do not believe that there is a significant distinction between opportunity and permission in this case. Since God created the opportunity, is there not a de-facto permission? On the other hand, the tree of knowledge debunks my whole argument. Oh well.
I did like my spiffy Woody Allen analogy, though.